Content creation

Genuine, AI‑Assisted Content Creation for Nadikosh

Why We Want to Create Content

Our movement depends on a living, active community, not just ideas. We want to create engaging content on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and others so that more people join our cause and participate in river protection. Through consistent, meaningful content, we aim to turn passive viewers into an active community that is essential for any long‑term movement.

What Kind of Content We Want to Produce

Right now, we ourselves know very little about our rivers. Instead of waiting to “become experts” first, we want to learn while creating. Our plan is to focus on one river at a time and build a detailed, long‑running series: in‑depth videos, supporting social media posts, and daily shorts that feel like an ongoing TV serial. As we research and publish each episode, we slowly transform from beginners into experts on that river, while our audience grows and learns with us.

How We Want to Work With AI

We want to use AI as much as possible to speed up research and production, but without compromising on truth or integrity. Our goal is to avoid low‑effort “AI slop” that repeats internet hallucinations, propaganda, or factually wrong narratives about India and its rivers. AI should help us read faster, summarize better, and structure our ideas, but human judgment must stay at the center so that our content remains honest, respectful, and grounded in reliable sources.

The Role of NotebookLM in Our Workflow

We have tried many tools: generic AI video generators, AI content writers, and even local language models. All of them felt limited compared to NotebookLM. NotebookLM is unique because it lets us ground everything in our chosen sources and then learn quickly from them. At this stage, it feels like NotebookLM will be the main “research engine” around which our entire content pipeline revolves, while other tools act as supporting utilities for tasks like editing, image generation, and publishing.

Our Practical Limitations

We are a very small team with only a few active members, and we are working on many fronts at the same time: apps, websites, on‑ground activities, and content. High‑quality, fully manual content production for every channel is simply not realistic right now. To maintain overall momentum of the movement, we have to lean heavily on AI in the early phase, otherwise we risk getting stuck perfecting one piece (like video production) while neglecting other equally important areas such as app development or ground work.

Does the Use of AI Really Matter?

This leads to a deeper question: for people who sincerely want clean rivers and truly love our rivers, does it matter whether we used AI or not? In one sense, they mainly care about real‑world outcomes and would want us to use every effective tool available to accelerate the movement. But over‑reliance on AI can damage trust if our content starts to look lazy, generic, or opportunistic, as if we care more about shortcuts and money than about sincere effort. The real challenge is to find the right balance: using enough AI to keep our pace high, without crossing the invisible line where people feel we are no longer authentic or hardworking.

Three Possible Approaches to Content Generation

Based on these reflections, we see three main methods we can adopt right now. Each has clear advantages and risks for our mission.

a) Only Research for Now, No Major Public Content

In this approach, we focus on repairing our apps and websites and dedicate our remaining time purely to river research (for example, on Mahanadi and Kaveri). We write internal articles, build scripts, and prepare future content, but we do not push aggressively on public videos or campaigns. Occasional posts may happen, but they are not the priority.

• Pros:

  • We slowly build a strong knowledge base and are better prepared to launch high‑quality content in the future.
  • When we finally start, our articles and videos can be much more accurate, deep, and polished.

• Cons:

  • This significantly slows down our public presence and community building.
  • While we are already researching anyway, we might miss opportunities where even simple, early videos could attract people and go viral, bringing support when we need it most.

b) Deep Research + Human Content Producers

In this method, our core team focuses on heavy research and script writing. We aim to create very well‑researched, high‑quality scripts and then collaborate with dedicated content creators who can put serious effort into turning those scripts into polished public content.

• Pros:

  • We look genuinely committed and serious, with strong, well‑crafted content that people can trust and feel proud to share.
  • We start with a strong image and set a high standard for accuracy and depth.

• Cons:

  • We may end up over‑focusing on one component (video quality) at the cost of other essential parts of the movement, such as on‑ground work, community organizing, or technology development.
  • Great videos alone do not guarantee river cleaning; if too much energy goes into production, our overall mission could become unbalanced.

Read more about this workflow here Robust workflow

c) Go All‑In on AI‑Generated Videos

In this approach, we accept that video production is not our unique strength and treat it as a by‑product. We focus our core energy on building Nadikosh as a thoroughly researched and verified knowledge base. Once Nadikosh is strong, we allow NotebookLM (and similar tools) to generate videos and posts directly from this database and publish them with minimal manual polishing.

• Pros:

  • We maintain high overall speed and keep moving on multiple fronts at once.
  • Social media channels stay active and receive a steady stream of content while we continue building Nadikosh in the background.

• Cons:

  • The first impression might be weak if the videos look too generic, robotic, or impersonal.
  • If people sense over‑automation, it could backfire and create doubt about our sincerity, especially in the early phase when trust is fragile.

---

Towards a Balanced Philosophy

All three methods reflect real tensions between speed, depth, authenticity, and resources. Our challenge is not simply to choose one, but to consciously design a hybrid approach that matches our current stage. We need to protect the heart of the movement—genuine devotion to the rivers and commitment to truth—while still embracing AI as a powerful helper, not a replacement for human integrity.